India, my India!
The recent 20th anniversary celebrations of the fall of Berlin wall had an unlikely fallout here in India. The hopeless romantics amongst us got off indulging in unnecessary and ill-informed banter about Indo-Pak unification. What made it incredible was the fact that such discussions were being spearheaded by people you’d normally believe to be well read.
Many years ago, as part of a school competition, I had written an article about the basis for formation of a nation. I’ll try and reproduce the gist of the piece and add my two cents of learning since then.
Every nation in history has had its foundation in either one or both of the two basic pillars - religion and language. Notwithstanding invasions and temporary conquests, these have been the only unifying factors.
This brings us to India - a marvel that seemingly has no such basis for existence. We are as fragmented as we could be - half a dozen major religions, a few hundred castes, thousands of sub-sects and millions of deities. We supposedly have close to 2000 recognized languages and god-awful number of derived dialects. Though all this makes for a nice statement about oft lauded Indian diversity, it also brings to the fore the lack of a common thread that could keep a country glued together.
In this context, it is no surprise that we are strife ridden - be it the religious riots, Naxal violence, the Maratha Manoos, Kashmir separatism, Khalistan movement or any of the innumerable other skirmishes. The undercurrent of hatred erupts every once in while, primarily online. A cursory glance at the discussion forums on any of the India-focussed content sites would suffice. Even the most harmless of articles like a movie review is enough to polarize our people - often on geographic lines between the “southies” and the “northies”.
This can be traced back to our history. Till the beginning of the 20th century, we were nothing more than a collection of princely provinces unified by invasion. The idea of India has absolutely no historical basis. At different times in our history, we had morphed as dictated by the military muscle of the dominant kingdom. Even the religious books like the Ramayana considered “Bharath” to be the fertile lands north of the Vindhyas. The “rest of the Indians” were either primates or random beasts. The only unfortunate commonality was the strict social stratification perpetuated by bloodline. For all the noise that we make about racism, India has been and will be (at least for a few more generations) the most racist country (and also the most hypocritical one).
Hence, it is astonishing how we managed to wriggle our Independence. Not everyone was unhappy under the British rule.
India’s first war of Independence in 1857 was dismissed and derided by the intellectuals of Bengal and the South as nothing more than a drunken misadventure. Trade, commerce, technology and western education flourished under the British. The oft neglected lower castes felt a little more secure. A lot of social inequities were diluted as the whole nation was one of slaves.
The idea of India comprising of the current nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and parts of Afghanistan is a fairly recent one - not older than a couple of hundred years. The dominant communities in these present day nations are as different as chalk and cheese. People may cry hoarse about generations of marriage across the current borders; which is true - but only within the community. The entire independence struggle was based on a very shaky truce between communities and provinces and the realization that it was the only way.
Post independence, the mistrust resurfaced and manifested in the form of creation of Pakistan - it was an eventuality that no one wanted to admit. It is easy to place the blame of partition on the shoulders of a few, but takes lot of courage to look beyond the sham of bonhomie forced upon us by the invading British. Pakistan’s creation, thus, was based on a very strong foundation of Islam. It would not have become the sorry mess of today had the rulers been ingrained in the tenets of Islam. I’m not, even for a moment, suggesting that fundamentalism is the way for Islamic states. Running a country requires discipline and that was lacking in the western educated rulers of Pakistan. All middle eastern nations are good examples of excellent governance - don’t slam me with human rights and other such nonsense. Trying to straddle the Islamic foundation with their brand of western capitalism, the ruling elite of Pakistan pushed themselves into chaos.
In the same breath, one needs to ask the question - then what is it thats holding India together?
People may offer a million answers - some jingoistic and others a little more plausible like economic interdependence.
However, I have a theory - THE GREED OF THE POLITICAL CLASS IN INDIA IS WHAT IS KEEPING US TOGETHER. It may seem very simplistic and to some, idiotic. But there is no stronger force than greed. The collective wealth of India is manifold than that of the sum of the parts. The potential to grow and multiply that wealth is limited only by one’s imagination if we stay together. And this opportunity with unlimited upside is one that is not lost on the politicians. Hence, inspite of their petty bickering and occasional secessionist spiels, our politicians will keep us together. And that is the irony of it all :)
To wrap up, Indo-Pak unification is not even fit to be a pipe dream because there is no role for Pakistan in this cozy arrangement. All you people thinking about it, STFU keep dreaming!!!
Disclaimer: I am NOT a separatist!
Now, you can start throwing the eggs!!!